CRICARCADE
Updates
← Games / Contact

Contact one person reads all of these

LAST UPDATED 16 September 2026

Expect a reply within a few days. Pick the channel that fits: email for data and business, Discord for the fast stuff, Reddit for the arguments.
📧

Email

hello@cricarcade.com

Use this for anything about your data: seeing what is held on you, correcting it, or asking for it to be deleted. Also for advertising and business matters, and for anything you would rather not post in public.

This is the address for requests under the GDPR and India’s DPDP Act, and it reaches the person responsible for the site directly.

◈

Discord

Join Discord Server

Faster in public, because someone else has usually hit it too: bugs, a rating that looks wrong, or a match that played out oddly. Say which game and roughly when.

⬆

r/TheCricketLab

reddit.com/r/TheCricketLab

For longer arguments about squads, tactics and what to build next. The best design notes ever written about this site were typed by strangers at 2am.

🗑️

Deleting your account yourself

You do not need to email anyone for this. Your account page deletes your handle, every recorded campaign and your sign-in record permanently, immediately.

Details are in the privacy policy.

Reporting a wrong number

The archives, player pages and ratings are built from published scorecards, so a mistake there usually traces back to one bad record. The quickest reports to act on name three things: the page it appears on (a link is best), the figure as shown, and where you have seen the correct one, such as a scorecard or an official record.

A record is only changed when a second source gives the right value. A figure that is missing somewhere else is not enough on its own, because gaps in old scorecards are common and filling them with a guess makes the archive worse, not better.

Ratings are a different case. They are a judgement built on real careers, so a rating you disagree with is a fair argument to have on Discord or Reddit rather than an error report. Say who, what you would rate them, and why; the reasoning is what gets read.